Reference · Due diligence

Supplier Vetting Checklist

A written checklist you can send to three shortlisted factories and compare side by side — including the evasive answers that signal a problem.

Supplier selection fails in a predictable way: the buyer asks questions that are easy to answer well, everyone answers them well, and nothing is learned. The checklist below is built the other way round — each question has a strong answer and a weak answer, and the point is to hear which one you get. Send it in writing. According to [Fisher, Ury & Patton, 2011], negotiants reach better outcomes when they insist on objective criteria rather than trading assertions, and a written record of answers is exactly that.

Google who makes this? Groups has anyone used them? Instagram is the plant real? Website what are the terms? Direct can they build it? Each stage answers a different question, so a supplier present at only the first one fails the other four. Stages two and three happen in Facebook groups and on Instagram — outside a supplier's own site, and outside its control.
Figure 1 The path a buyer walks before the first message is ever sent. Each stage answers a different question, and the two in the middle happen inside Facebook sourcing groups and on Instagram — outside a supplier's own site entirely, which is why a certificate on a homepage settles so little. Source: Observed across inbound enquiries and public discussion in sourcing groups. No survey data is claimed.
Twenty questions, and the answer that should worry you
GroupQuestionWeak answer to watch for
IdentityWhat is your registered legal name and business licence number?A trading name with no licence to check it against
IdentityDo you manufacture, trade, or both — and for which components?"We can do everything" with no in-house detail
CapabilityWhich processes happen on site?No answer about subcontracted moulding or coating
CapabilityWhat is monthly capacity for this product family?A number with no relation to the line you are standing in
QualityWalk me through your inspection stages"No problem, our quality is very good"
QualityWhat is your measured outgoing defect rate?A figure they cannot produce records for
MaterialsWho supplies your silicone, and from which grade?"We use high-quality silicone"
MaterialsIs the silicone platinum-cured or peroxide-cured?Not knowing the difference
ComplianceWhich third-party laboratory issues your material reports?Internal reports presented as third-party evidence
ComplianceCan you name the test method behind each certificate?Certificates referenced with no method
CommercialWhat are the separate minimums for product, branding and packaging?One blended number that hides the real constraint
CommercialAre tooling costs quoted separately from unit price?Tooling buried in the unit price
ToolingWho owns the mould I commission?Anything short of full buyer ownership in writing
TermsWhat supports a rush order, at what cost?A promise to accelerate without a stated price
TermsHow long is your quote valid, and what moves it?No validity window
LogisticsWhich Incoterms do you quote, and can you show all three?Only one term offered
LogisticsWhat documents ship with the goods?Discovering a missing document at customs
AftercareWhat is your written warranty and its start date?A verbal assurance of support
AftercareHow are disputes resolved, and in writing?No stated process
ChannelDo you sell direct to consumers in my market?A direct channel that will compete with yours

Turning the answers into a scorecard

The checklist above tells you what to ask. A supplier scorecard — the same idea procurement teams run as a weighted grid — tells you how to compare the answers across three or four candidates without the comparison collapsing into a price column. Each dimension below is scored 1 to 5 against the evidence the checklist produced, then multiplied by a weight that reflects how much that dimension decides whether the relationship survives contact. The grid is the discipline that stops a charming call from beating a merely complete one.

An eight-dimension supplier scorecard for a private-label wellness-device programme
DimensionWhat the score reflectsWeight
Quality systemISO 9001 scope, documented defect-rate records, 100% final inspection20%
Capacity & lead timeStated monthly capacity vs your volume, a history of hitting dates15%
Compliance & documentsNamed third-party laboratories, CE/RoHS/FDA cited to a method15%
Commercial clarityTooling quoted separately, three minimums stated apart12%
IP & tooling protectionBuyer-owned tooling in writing, an NDA before any spec12%
ResponsivenessTime to answer the brief, clarity under follow-up10%
Logistics & IncotermsOffers both FOB and DDP, the document set stated8%
After-salesA written warranty, a named dispute process8%
Quality system 5/5 Capacity & lead 4/5 Compliance 5/5 Commercial clarity 3/5 IP & tooling 4/5 Responsiveness 4/5 Logistics 3/5 After-sales 4/5 Each bar is the dimension score (1–5); the weight column, not the bar length, decides the ranking.
Figure 2 A sample weighted scorecard across the eight dimensions for one candidate. The bars are the dimension score (1–5); the weight column — not the bar length — decides which dimension ranks the supplier. Source: Illustrative weights for a private-label wellness-device programme. Adjust the weight column to your own risk profile; the structure travels, the numbers do not.
  1. Fisher, R., Ury, W. & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, 3rd ed. New York: Penguin Books.
  2. Juran, J. M. & Godfrey, A. B. (1999). Juran's Quality Handbook, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  3. Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management, 5th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  4. Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C. & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Questions on this reference

How quickly should a factory answer this?

A factory with its documentation in order answers within a business day. Slowness is not always evasion — it can mean a small team — but it should be explained rather than ignored.

What is the single most useful question to ask?

Who makes the product, and who receives the payment? If those are two different companies, you are buying from the second one and auditing the first. Everything else on the checklist follows from that answer.

Is a business licence enough to verify a factory?

No. It proves a registered entity exists, not that it manufactures anything, and not that the entity is the one you will be paying. Pair it with a live walkthrough and a report number you can check with the issuing laboratory.

Should I visit before or after wiring a deposit?

Before. A visit after the deposit verifies a supplier you have already paid, which is a dispute rather than due diligence. The audit checklist is what to do once you are on the floor.

What is the difference between the checklist and a supplier scorecard?

The checklist is the input — twenty questions you send in writing to every candidate. The scorecard is the comparison: the same answers scored 1 to 5 on a weighted grid so three or four candidates become one ranked shortlist. Run the checklist first; the scorecard is meaningless without the written answers underneath it.

How should I weight a scorecard for this category?

For a body-contact device, weight quality system, compliance documents and IP/tooling protection above price and responsiveness — those three are what end a relationship, not the unit cost. The weights on this page are a starting point; the discipline that matters is scoring every candidate on the same grid, not the exact percentages.

Next: what one day on the floor proves — or who runs the line behind this range.

WhatsApp +86 131 4328 3592